[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/08/27]
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:59:36AM -0700, Chris Nandor wrote:
> Technically, no one DOES need transactions. Everything you do with
> transactions CAN be done in a different way (usually much more painful, of
> course). So I don't think it is as misleading as the PostgreSQL fans like
> to say it is, though it certainly isn't the most honest thing to say,
> either. :-)
That's only true if you have full support for SQL92 or later isn't it?
Which MySQL most certainly doesn't.
--
Grand Inquisitor David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david
Saul hath slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands
-- 1 Samuel 18:7
There's stuff above here
Generated at 19:00 on 27 Feb 2006 by mariachi 0.52