Re: Misconfigured anti-spam software

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/12/24]

From: Aaron J. Grier
Subject: Re: Misconfigured anti-spam software
Date: 22:37 on 24 Dec 2003
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:35:51AM -0800, Ann Barcomb wrote:
> And, if mail is only unsolicited, why reply, since the address is
> probably forged?  Just delete it.

on a related note, one of my lusers has a whitelist program [1] which
sends an autoreply to EVERY message he gets asking them to go to a web
site and type in a magic number (à la yahoo) to be added to his
whitelist.

this wouldn't piss me off so much except he's hesitant to let me trash
anything with a high spamassassin score, and thus consistently has 60+
messages pending to bogus addresses in the outbound mail queue on any
given night.

aww fsck it.  I'm doing it anyway.  he'll never notice.

[1] Choicemail: http://www.digiportal.com/ . ironically their
    newsletters are sent from blacklisted netblocks and contain enough
    goofy HTML to trip spamassassin.

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agrier@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
  "someday the industry will have throbbing frontal lobes and will be able
  to write provably correct software.  also, I want a pony." -- Zach Brown

Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52