Re: Mail.app

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/02/03]

From: Matt McLeod
Subject: Re: Mail.app
Date: 01:40 on 03 Feb 2004

Peter da Silva wrote:
> It's mostly a pretty decent mail program, just... needs a bit of polishing.
> I wouldn't complain, except that I'm afraid Apple's working on new timewasting
> animations instead of actual useful UI enhancements (at least if their new
> Finder is anything to go by they are).

Given that they *still* haven't provided a way to get to the next
message when you're viewing a message in its own window, I don't
think we're going to be seeing any new "non-sexy" features in Mail.app.

ISTR that some people were writing a clone with things like these
fixed.  Not sure what state it's in, as I haven't looked at it in
about eighteen months.  Should be easy enough to track down, though.

-- 
                    Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday

There's stuff above here

Mail.app peter (Peter da Silva) 20:58 on 02 Feb 2004
- Re: Mail.app Matt McLeod 01:40 on 03 Feb 2004
Mail.app Nicholas Clark 16:45 on 29 Jul 2005
- Re: Mail.app Nicholas Clark 17:05 on 29 Jul 2005
  - Luke Kanies 18:01 on 29 Jul 2005
    - too deep to show
Mail.app Robert Spier 23:52 on 12 Oct 2005
- Re: Mail.app Nicholas Clark 00:04 on 13 Oct 2005
- Steven Smolinski 03:13 on 13 Oct 2005
- Peter da Silva 05:58 on 13 Oct 2005
  - A. Pagaltzis 07:51 on 13 Oct 2005

Generated at 08:00 on 13 Oct 2005 by mariachi 0.52