Re: terminals and urls and copying

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/03/24]

From: Luke A. Kanies
Subject: Re: terminals and urls and copying
Date: 19:37 on 24 Mar 2004
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Simon Wistow wrote:

> Terminals seem to be another of those things that you'd think would be
> really simple (display text and, err, that's about it) but are actually
> a bottomless pit of hate situated in the Mountains of Loathing, deep
> within the steamy Destest Jungle on the Island of
> F&*CKINGPIECEOFSHIT!!@$%

Colors, selection, baud, control modes, stty, you name it, lotsa hate.

> Some terminals highlight a URL that scrolls past and allow you to double
> click on it and it will be loade din a browser. They ones that do that
> have, in my experience, many other, often unrelated hates which
> preclude's their use. But thi is fine since I can just highlight the URL
> like so and switch to my other window and paste it into my browser's URL
> bar. No great hardship.
>
> But wait! What's this? I have pasted blank *cough*
>
> I go back. I look again. Oh, I see, it was in an IRC window and somebody
> has said something so the line I highlighted has moved up.
>
> CLEARLY THIS MEANT THAT YOU SHOULD CLEAR THE CLIPBOARD. YOU PIECE OF
> SHIT.

At this point I can only recommend RXVT, which has likely protected me
from a significant amount of terminal hate.  I have no such problem with
RXVT, and seldom do I hate it (although, like all Unix things, it took me
a while to get it that way, e.g., colors).

-- 
"I worry that the person who thought up Muzak may be thinking up
something else."
     --Lily Tomlin

Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52