Re: "hating gcc" or "random errors make life interesting"

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/04/05]

> 		if (i<0) break;
> 		//cerr << "";

> Which is all well and good. Except, well, notice the commented out 
> thing at the bottom? If I uncomment it, it works perfectly. If it's 
> commented than it all goes tits up and never recognises the end of a 
> sub-sequence.

I have EXACTLY the same problem with a C (not C++) program on HPUX 11
using HP's own compiler (not GCC). This is on code I originally wrote
for Xenix-286 in 1980... something that's been ported to SVR0-68000,
SVR2-x86, Solaris-Sparc, Solaris-X86, OpenVMS-VAX, OpenVMS-Alpha, SCO,
OSF1^WDigital UNIX^W^WTru64, FreeBSD, and Linux.

If I put any debugging code, even 'fprintf(stderr, "");', it works,
otherwise it terminates (normally, exit(0)) without producing output.

• "hating gcc" or "random errors make life interesting" Simon Wistow 11:38 on 05 Apr 2004
  • Re: "hating gcc" or "random errors make life interesting" peter (Peter da Silva) 13:54 on 05 Apr 2004
    • Simon Wistow 15:02 on 05 Apr 2004

Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52