Re: Auto-reply software

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/06/10]

From: Ann Barcomb
Subject: Re: Auto-reply software
Date: 12:13 on 10 Jun 2004
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, John Sinteur wrote:

> > Vacation programs should also keep some kind of log of people who have
> > been notified about this vacation.  A reply once every 24-hours or so
> > per person is quite enough; I don't need a reply for every single
> > email.
> I've written a vacation program myself once, and I considered once
> quite enough. I'd hate to get the same message every day..
Once a day was tossed out as a value to satisfy the corporate sensibilities.
My personal preference is for once as well.

> Thank heavens for mail servers that have loop detection. I've seen
> servers go "you authenticate" "no, YOU authenticate" to each other
> until they got the kill -9...
Two organisations who have installed this crap software deserve to
get stuck in this kind of a loop, if you ask me.

If they could put the doctor program in to the loop, they might even
generate something worth reading.

"Why do you think it is that you feel that you should authenticate?"

"First tell me why you ask why do you think it is that you feel that you should
authenticate?"

> I always make it a point to send a polite phrased message to the mail
> admins, telling them in friendly terms what I'm going to repleat in
> plain words here: they look like incompetent dorks and total fuckwits
[snip]
Maybe I should do something like that too, but instead I just have it
filed as spam.  It's too much work to try to fix the world, so I stick
with one serious complaint at a time.  I haven't encountered something
I hate more than required JavaScript recently.
There's stuff above here

Generated at 09:00 on 03 Aug 2004 by mariachi 0.52