Re: GCC

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/08/22]

From: Jarkko Hietaniemi
Subject: Re: GCC
Date: 21:14 on 22 Aug 2004

> 
> Yes, it's useful. It is NOT, however, C. This kind of thing should require
> compilation with "--butthead-extensions" and several embarassing "#pragma"
> lines to make sure that it's NEVER used by anyone who isn't completely
> aware they're being a wanker.

gcc is full of those.  Some people actually think gcc -Wall will protect
them from unportabilities.

-- 
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@xxx.xx> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'.  It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen

(no message)
- GCC peter (Peter da Silva) 12:41 on 20 Aug 2004
  - Re: GCC Jarkko Hietaniemi 21:14 on 22 Aug 2004
    - too deep to show
  - Daniel Pittman 04:55 on 24 Aug 2004

Generated at 15:00 on 24 Aug 2004 by mariachi 0.52