Re: Phone numbers and form fields

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/03/03]

From: Darrell Fuhriman
Subject: Re: Phone numbers and form fields
Date: 21:51 on 03 Mar 2005

> From the number of sites that have a fit about it, it's rocket science.

Which is why it's #6 on the "Most Persistent Design Bugs".

http://www.asktog.com/Bughouse/10MostPersistentBugs.html

Darrell

There's stuff above here

Re: Phone numbers and form fields peter (Peter da Silva) 21:23 on 03 Mar 2005
- Darrell Fuhriman 21:51 on 03 Mar 2005
Juerd 21:24 on 03 Mar 2005
Jarkko Hietaniemi 21:56 on 03 Mar 2005
- velut luna. immanis. 22:15 on 03 Mar 2005
  - Juerd 23:27 on 03 Mar 2005
- Rhesa Rozendaal 22:33 on 03 Mar 2005
  - Philip Newton 05:41 on 04 Mar 2005
    - too deep to show
- Abigail 23:09 on 03 Mar 2005
  - Ann Barcomb 08:23 on 04 Mar 2005
    - too deep to show
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 13:47 on 04 Mar 2005
    - too deep to show
- Philip Newton 05:39 on 04 Mar 2005
  - Abigail 08:29 on 04 Mar 2005
  - Chris Devers 15:09 on 04 Mar 2005
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 14:36 on 05 Mar 2005
  - Aaron Crane 11:01 on 07 Mar 2005
    - too deep to show
Tony Bowden 22:04 on 03 Mar 2005
Philip Newton 05:35 on 04 Mar 2005
- Phil Pennock 17:15 on 04 Mar 2005
David Cantrell 14:27 on 04 Mar 2005
Darrell Fuhriman 16:29 on 04 Mar 2005
velut luna. immanis. 17:43 on 04 Mar 2005
- Hakim 17:49 on 04 Mar 2005
- Nicholas Clark 18:08 on 04 Mar 2005
Earle Martin 20:03 on 01 Apr 2005

Generated at 05:00 on 02 Apr 2005 by mariachi 0.52