Re: Travel Agent Booking Software

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/17]

From: Jarkko Hietaniemi
Subject: Re: Travel Agent Booking Software
Date: 09:36 on 17 Apr 2005
> for having such inconvenient preferences; at no point were they in the
> slightest bit apologetic for the fact that their system was hopeless at
> being helpful in my circumstances.

I know this list is about hating software -- but oh, whine whine whine,
WHY should *they* be *apologetic* to *you* about software they were not
responsible for?

> Yup, no list to pick from; no autocompletion; no textual searching by
> real-world names; no map to point at: the interface requires the person
> using it to have memorized the 3-letter IATA code for all the
> destinations' airports.

Autocompletion, yes, maybe, that could be useful, but I have to say that
the couple of times I've had a clear view to the software the travel
agents are doing I must say that I have been *impressed* by the speed
they type away and find and check stuff.  I have no idea what software
they are using, sorry, but to me it always looks very much like
mainframe operator work, and when they are good at it, they are
very good at it.  We've all memorized silly things which we use daily
without thinking because we need them in our work.  They need IATA
codes.  I still remember the IP addresses of machines long gone, for
example. Why should they be forced to use whiz-bang GUI interfaces?
I can only imagine the horror of a drop down menu of all the world's
airports...

> And a hateful side effect of this specification by airport rather than
> location is that there's no easy way to request departures from 'any
> London airport' -- you have to list "LGW", "LHR", etc separately.
> Except that there are only 3 of these fields for providing acceptable
> departure points, and London has more than 3 airports, so you have to
> perform separate searches to check all of them.  And when you go back to
> change the departure point all the other fields get reset too ...

Without any idea of what software they were using and without any idea
of what kind of software is out there, I hazard a guess that *maybe*
they didn't quite know how to use the software the best way?  Again, I
have in general been very impressed, even for my sometimes
"unconventional" requests.

> Hate!
> 
> Smylers


-- 
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@xxx.xx> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'.  It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
There's stuff above here

Generated at 11:00 on 21 Apr 2005 by mariachi 0.52