[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/22]
And with strange aeons, even Peter da Silva replies (Fri, 22 Apr 2005): > Personally, I prefer not having to run installers at all because apps > don't have to get installed in 10 separate directories at once. Pardon my Windows-based ignorance, but if certain kinds of apps didn't install parts of themselves in certain other directories, how would they talk with other apps? I'm thinking of things that associate file types to them, or that talk to other apps, such as Firefox determining it's the default browser, or iTunes owning .mp3s, or such. >> So was I. And then I bought a Mac Mini, only to after a month realize >> that Mac OS X is software like all other, and deserves a good piece of >> hate. > > Yes, but it's a *dry* hate. *snort* > If there is, it pops that window to the top and focuses on it. *pats her TweakUI* -x -- Until you are willing to be confused about what you already know, what you know will never become wider, bigger or deeper. - Milton EriksonThere's stuff above here
Generated at 01:00 on 03 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52