Re: Subversion (was: Re: Upgrading without central packaging)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/27]

From: Michael G Schwern
Subject: Re: Subversion (was: Re: Upgrading without central packaging)
Date: 06:10 on 27 Apr 2005
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:58:32AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> On 4/26/05, Dave Vandervies <dj3vande@xxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > The system I'm sending this from has a /bin/true that comes close to
> > fitting that description.  Not like the one on the other end of the SSH
> > connection.  (Linus Torvalds's comment about version and copyright
> > notices comes to mind.)
> 
> Which comment is that?

I'd imagine it refers to the GNU standard switch madness.

schwern@mungus:~$ /bin/true --version
true (GNU coreutils) 5.2.1
Written by Jim Meyering.

Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
schwern@mungus:~$ /bin/true --help   
Usage: /bin/true [ignored command line arguments]
  or:  /bin/true OPTION
Exit with a status code indicating success.

These option names may not be abbreviated.

      --help     display this help and exit
      --version  output version information and exit

Report bugs to <bug-coreutils@xxx.xxx>.
schwern@mungus:~$ 

As opposed to BSD true which *gasp* doesn't accept any switches.

You can see this in the tchrist's zen-like implementation of true in PPT.
http://ppt.perl.org/commands/true/true.simple

As opposed to the "complete" implementation
http://ppt.perl.org/commands/true/true.fancy

There's stuff above here

Generated at 23:00 on 01 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52