[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/09/17]
On 9/17/05, Nicholas Clark <nick@xxxx.xxx> wrote: > Then again, I suspect software on VMS is sufficiently hateful that would = need > a whole list just for it. Maybe HATE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, and then see how > all the MUA software out there copes with the distinction... Then advertise it as HATE @ hates-software . com and see how many people can really parse RFC 2?822 addresses, including optional whitespace and comments between tokens. But yes. Hateful software that assumes it can just uppercase anything (why on earth would one want to do that anyway? If at all, wouldn't all-lowercase be easier to read? Oh, I forgot, you wouldn't then be able to spell "God" properly). I'll gnashingly admit that this is guaranteed to work for the bit to the right of the at-sign, but local-parts (with the exception of /postmaster/i) are *defined* to be case-sensitive. --=20 Philip Newton <philip.newton@xxxxx.xxx>There's stuff above here
Generated at 11:00 on 20 Sep 2005 by mariachi 0.52