Re: Significant whitespace (was Re: Blogging sucks)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/10/17]

From: A. Pagaltzis
Subject: Re: Significant whitespace (was Re: Blogging sucks)
Date: 16:21 on 17 Oct 2005
* Luke Kanies <luke@xxxxxxx.xxx> [2005-10-17 17:05]:
> I'm guessing Pine has no relationship to whether this works;
> I'm thinking instead that it's the terminal itself.  But I
> don't know, and I'm not likely to spend the hours and hours it
> would take to find out and then fix every terminal I have.

If it was the terminal then the character would show up screwy,
but it wouldn't get mangled in your reply.

> It just seems stupid to screw with a character that was already
> working fine in the lower bits. I feel similarly but not quite
> as bitter about people who do stupid "smart" quotes, because
> wow they're bloody annoying to handle with parsing programs.

What I'm using *is* a smart quote, I just think that's a stupid
name.

The straight quotes were a typewriter invention, along with
monospace fonts. Someday computers will catch up to all the
features that paper had about 400 years ago.

PS.: this mail with straight quotes for your pleasure.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>;
There's stuff above here

Generated at 20:00 on 17 Oct 2005 by mariachi 0.52