mutt.

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/01/24]

From: Guy Thornley
Subject: mutt.
Date: 03:27 on 24 Jan 2006

You'd think that by 2006 that it would be OK to have the Fcc: of messages
set to either

        (a) the folder of the message you reply to, or
        (b) the current mail folder, if a new message

but nooo, not in mutt. Impossible. Using shell-fu to emit 'set record' hooks
for all the mailboxes is gay, since it doesnt work for IMAP.

The Genius of it, actually the simple Brilliance and Sheer Glory, is that
is implementing the \0, \1 ... regex match substitutions that *every*
reasonable scripting language has would fix it.

Blah. HATE.

-Q

mutt. Guy Thornley 03:27 on 24 Jan 2006
- Re: mutt. David Champion 05:29 on 24 Jan 2006
  - too deep to show
- Bruce Richardson 07:55 on 24 Jan 2006

Generated at 20:00 on 25 Jan 2006 by mariachi 0.52