[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/03/15]
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:41:47PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * David Cantrell <david@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx> [2006-03-14 11:50]:
> >On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:07:17PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> >> That is a fine theory, except so many webapps would cease to
> >> work (yes, they're hateful; no, that doesn't mean Firefox can
> >> ignore them) that the popup blocking setting would have to be
> >> considered hateful ANYWAY. Maybe extra-strong popup blocking
> >> should be a hidden pref.
> >None that I can think of. Well, none that I want to work
> >anyway, cos the only ones I can think of are advertising shite.
> >Really, I can't think of a single site I've ever used where I
> >would want popups to appear other than in the circumstances I
> >specified.
> I use several sites where the [Preview] button on a posting form
> pops up a window
You mean that something pops up when you click on something? That's
precisely what my cunning plan would permit.
--
David Cantrell | Benevolent Dictator Of The World
I remember when computers were frustrating because they did
exactly what you told them to. That seems kinda quaint now.
-- JD Baldwin, in the Monastery
There's stuff above here
Generated at 23:00 on 18 Mar 2006 by mariachi 0.52