[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/05/22]
David Champion wrote: > * On 2006.05.21, in <Pine.LNX.4.58.0605212232230.32130@xxxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx>, > * "Luke Kanies" <luke@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote: >> If you use Slackware, you get what you deserve, but I defy you to somehow >> find Debian more execreble than FreeBSD. > > I'd really like to, since you're defying, but I've buried those > memories deep. We'll have to settle for "yup, did that." I guess I should have added a "now" on the end there. >> and whose model can be used on other OSes? Sure, anyone can write a one-off >> imperative script for any OS; but I contend that if you had to write a >> single tool that could treat any set of, say, three operating systems >> equally, then you would find FreeBSD to be the most difficult to model >> successfully. > > Which are the other two? Solaris and Debian, if I get to pick. I'd recommend HP-UX and OS X if you're trying to make FreeBSD win (I never did find an automated way to reboot HP-UX nicely), but at least both of those OSes have a real concept of a service. -- Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft! -- Theodore Roosevelt --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.comThere's stuff above here
Generated at 14:00 on 27 May 2006 by mariachi 0.52