[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/05/23]
On Tue, 23 May 2006 20:39:43 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <pagaltzis@xxx.xx> wrote:
> * jrodman@xxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx <jrodman@xxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> [2006-05-23 19:10]:
> > But if we're going to wander into "inconsistent widgets are
> > terrible" territory (which they are), I'm going to have to
> > mention the joy of Opera for Linux.
>
> I abandoned Opera when they went from pure-Qt in 5.x to a skinned
> interface in 6.x. I cannot fathom, oh no I can't, why it suddenly
> felt almost as sluggish as Mozilla.
ATM Qt is the biggest problem for me :/
> Now, I keep Opera around to test any web layout stuff I do.
> Purely for those rare occasions, I went looking for a theme that
> would irritate me at least a little bit less. Well guess what,
> there is NOT A SINGLE FREAKIN' THEME for Opera that DOES NOT BLOW
> CHUNKS. It's all k3wl eyec4ndy cow manure. Every. Single. One of
> them. Craptacular beyond belief.
How much skin do you need? Or better how bare can you strip it?
This is my Opera9 on OpenSUSE 10.0 with KDE 3.5.2 with HTTP::Proxy
as dynamic page changer:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hmbrand/opera9.jpg
--
H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.9.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11,
& 11.23, SuSE 10.0, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, and Cygwin. http://qa.perl.org
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
There's stuff above here
Generated at 09:00 on 29 May 2006 by mariachi 0.52