[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/06/27]
>>> Ahhhh, the language that has twice the brackets of Lisp with half the >>> functionality. Lovely. >> Half? HALF?! > > Yeah, about half normally, and with none of the sensible, well defined > semantics or useful constancy to the structure. > > Because having random distinctions between data formats, and a "not > quite structured" set of text settings is so much saner than the Lisp > model of "everything works this one, single, simple way." > > > At least XSLT isn't as bad as the wretched specification that actually > *did* implement Lisp in XML, by grafting in a syntax for evaluating XML > expressions. > > Thankfully that died the miserable and stupid death it deserved, eh? Sir, you need to practice more the noble art of trolling. > DanielThere's stuff above here
Generated at 20:01 on 27 Jun 2006 by mariachi 0.52