Re: CGI.pm

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/06/27]

On 27/06/06, Aaron Crane <hateful@xxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx> wrote:
> OK, now I know that CGI.pm's HTML-generating functions are considered mor=
e
> than somewhat d=E9class=E9,

The mere existence of these methods is hateful.  Why?  Because they
are documented - now documentation is good of course, but when you
grep through CGI's docs to find out details of, for example, how to
use the `upload` method, you have to first step through lots of
details on creating an upload field that you are never going to use.
Hate.

osfameron

• CGI.pm Aaron Crane 13:11 on 27 Jun 2006
  • Re: CGI.pm Nik Clayton 14:03 on 27 Jun 2006
  • Hakim Cassimally 14:15 on 27 Jun 2006
  • A. Pagaltzis 19:47 on 27 Jun 2006
  • peter (Peter da Silva) 20:02 on 27 Jun 2006
    • A. Pagaltzis 20:16 on 27 Jun 2006
      • too deep to show

Generated at 21:00 on 05 Jul 2006 by mariachi 0.52