Re: RubyGems deciding version formats

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/11/10]

From: Roger Burton West
Subject: Re: RubyGems deciding version formats
Date: 10:52 on 10 Nov 2006
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:47:14AM -0800, jrodman@xxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote:

>Perhaps I have been poisoned by dpkg, but the sort order of such a
>version number seems obvious to me.  I suppose it might be wrong though.

I still take the approach that if you're going to call it a "number" it
should only have one decimal point in it, and no letters or punctuation.

>I can't put my finger on why I hate build numbers so much.

They're what happened when version numbers got taken over by the
marketing department, and then later someone noticed that being able to
distinguish between different minor versions of the same software was
still useful.

R
There's stuff above here

Generated at 23:01 on 18 Nov 2006 by mariachi 0.52