[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/12/10]
On Dec 10, 2006, at 5:35 PM, jrodman@xxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote: > You presume far too much, though. In my experience, the forces that be > are capable of: > 1) Keeping tcsh off the path on some of the systems. % ed .profile /exec tcsh/i PATH=/good:/path:$PATH . w q % > 2) Managing to drop some broken version of tcsh on some dark corner > the path on some systems which exits on exec, logging you out. % ed .profile /exec tcsh/i PATH=/good:/path:$PATH . w q % > If you think there is some clever way out of the foxhole in #2, I > assure > that more or new stupidity will defeat you even still. If things are that hateful, the location of tcsh is the least of your problems.There's stuff above here
Generated at 22:02 on 27 Dec 2006 by mariachi 0.52