Re: Regexps (was Re: Invalid Operating System)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/12/22]

From: Chris Devers
Subject: Re: Regexps (was Re: Invalid Operating System)
Date: 06:51 on 22 Dec 2006
On Dec 22, 2006, at 1:31 AM, jrodman@xxxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 01:16:33AM -0500, Chris Devers wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Peter da Silva wrote:
>>
>>> [...] Perl [...]
>>
>> Out of curiosity, at what point can we take it as "established" that
>> you just. don't. like. Perl. Hm?
>
> This is we-hates.  We're supposed to hate things.

Of course.

I guess my hate here is beating dead horses.

In my opinion -- and you're all encouraged to disagree -- the best  
Hates are short, direct, pithy, cutting, and cathartic. Hit, run,  
move on.

Taken too far though, it loses that and tips over into mania,  
obsession, tedium, and eventually just plain willy-waving. Hit, hit,  
hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit, hit,  
hit. Shit. Move nowhere.

The latter style of hate has drowned out the former.


-- 
Chris Devers
There's stuff above here

Generated at 22:02 on 27 Dec 2006 by mariachi 0.52