Re: cygwin (was: Excessively grandiose product names)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2007/01/24]

On Jan 24, 2007, at 1:01 PM, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:02:22 -0600, Peter da Silva <peter@xxxxxxx.xxx>  
> wrote:
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/interopmigration/unix/sfu/ 
>> default.mspx

> I'll try that, and promise not to complain about it before I tried.
> (Unless of course it is about the installation of the missing or
>  misleading documentation about the installation, might that happen)

Or broken links, or whatever, right.

> I would love to see KDE running on it :)

I would hesitate to try and get that running on FreeBSD or Mac OSX if I  
didn't have a port already, and I suspect Interix is less of a Linux  
lookalike than either. If that's your requirement, you'll probably have  
to stick with Cygwin.

Linux is UNIX, but UNIX is not Linux.

• Excessively grandiose product names Andy Armstrong 13:07 on 24 Jan 2007
  • cygwin (was: Excessively grandiose product names) Yossi Kreinin 15:32 on 24 Jan 2007
    • Re: cygwin (was: Excessively grandiose product names) Peter da Silva 15:42 on 24 Jan 2007
      • too deep to show
    • Re: cygwin (braindead installer) H.Merijn Brand 15:51 on 24 Jan 2007
  • Peter da Silva 20:08 on 24 Jan 2007
  • Re: Excessively grandiose product names A. Pagaltzis 01:17 on 25 Jan 2007

Generated at 04:02 on 27 Jan 2007 by mariachi 0.52