Re: Possibly PuTTY, possibly something else. It's still hate.

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2007/01/24]

From: H.Merijn Brand
Subject: Re: Possibly PuTTY, possibly something else. It's still hate.
Date: 12:53 on 24 Jan 2007
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:23:26 +0000, David Cantrell <david@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:16:41PM +0000, Martin Ebourne wrote:
> 
> > Modal dialogue boxes are the work of the devil. Every single use of  
> > one(*) is inexcusable.
> > 
> > (*) Apart from a locking screensaver, although that's not really  
> > modal, just full screen and in front.
> 
> Oh no it jolly well isn't!  Or if it is in front, it's not far enough in
> front.
> 
> On this 'ere box, if my screen is locked (using xscreensaver, so nothing
> unusual) and I'm running Evolution, then if Evolution decides to pop up
> an alarm thingy, it's visible.  Which is a Very Bad Thing.

Worse than Modal Dialogs are Modal dialogs that snatch focus and disappear
automatically after a timeout without returning focus to where it was
before they stole it. Hate!

-- 
H.Merijn Brand         Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.9.x   on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11,
& 11.23, SuSE 10.0 & 10.1, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, and Cygwin. http://qa.perl.org
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/            http://www.test-smoke.org
                        http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
There's stuff above here

Generated at 21:01 on 25 Jan 2007 by mariachi 0.52