Re: cygwin (was: Excessively grandiose product names)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2007/01/27]

From: Peter da Silva
Subject: Re: cygwin (was: Excessively grandiose product names)
Date: 19:09 on 27 Jan 2007

On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
> I miss Xt; it was butt-ugly but it worked, reliably and portably.  It
> was cool to be able to aim viewres at something and figure out how to
> configure it without having to fight whatever limited options the
> programmer might have exposed.  I'm probably forgetting a lot of pain,
> though.

Xaw is pretty good that way, too, and you could use Xaw3d or neXtaw to 
make it less ugly (or Xaw95 to make it more ugly).

Re: cygwin (was: Excessively grandiose product names) Peter da Silva 19:09 on 27 Jan 2007

Generated at 03:01 on 01 Feb 2007 by mariachi 0.52