Re: Denial of denial of service

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2007/01/29]

From: Yossi Kreinin
Subject: Re: Denial of denial of service
Date: 08:52 on 29 Jan 2007

Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Martin Ebourne wrote:
> 
>>
>>Oh come on, if you carry on like that then while, if, switch, or indeed
>>any program flow construct is a goto. Well, at the machine level they
>>are of course, but thinking of them like that at the language level will
>>do you no favours.
> 
> 
> *meh*  Don't try twisting a completely valid argument with a straw man
> argument.
> 

By the way, the strawmen who defined the MISRA coding rules (mandatory for 
automotive applications) did consider break and continue "non-structured" 
programming constructs and banned them together with goto (except for break in 
switch cases). Bastards.

There's stuff above here

Jarkko Hietaniemi 02:01 on 29 Jan 2007
- Yossi Kreinin 08:52 on 29 Jan 2007
- Andy Armstrong 11:15 on 29 Jan 2007
  - Peter da Silva 12:15 on 29 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show
  - Jarkko Hietaniemi 12:30 on 29 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show
Jonathan Stowe 11:05 on 29 Jan 2007
- Andrew Black - lists 16:49 on 29 Jan 2007
Peter da Silva 12:21 on 29 Jan 2007
- Martin Ebourne 12:36 on 29 Jan 2007
  - Peter da Silva 14:57 on 29 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show
Re: Denial of denial of service hv 13:36 on 29 Jan 2007
Peter da Silva 17:26 on 29 Jan 2007
- Andy Armstrong 17:29 on 29 Jan 2007
  - Peter da Silva 17:45 on 29 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show
David Cantrell 17:53 on 29 Jan 2007
peter (Peter da Silva) 18:21 on 30 Jan 2007
- Yossi Kreinin 08:04 on 31 Jan 2007
  - blah blah 08:39 on 31 Jan 2007
    - too deep to show

Generated at 23:01 on 06 Feb 2007 by mariachi 0.52