[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2002/09/24]
On Tuesday, Sep 24, 2002, at 12:48 Europe/London, Simon Batistoni wrote:
> On the subject of frobbing nacho, I keep suggesting to Simon (and he
> keeps grimacing reluctantly) that some of the stuff that's living in
> nacho's core should really be moved to a module or two.
He should be grimacing because there should be no code in the front of
nacho that is big enough to live in modules - it should *already* live
in the modules that we have.
> I'm saying this with particular reference to the desire for a
> web-based admin system, which would be (theoretically) easier to write
> if it could poach nacho's core in a clean way.
Nachos core {is,should be} the existing Siesta::* module hierarchy. If
it isn't than it's time to refactor nacho without mercy.
I'd repeat myself a third time, but that would be overkill :)
--
Richard Clamp <richardc@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
There's stuff above here
Generated at 13:56 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52