[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/04/04]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:58:12PM +0000, Richard Clamp wrote: > > On a seperate note, I've replaced the 'queues' sub in my Lists.pm with the > > following: > > > > sub queues { > > my $self = shift; > > my %queues = map { $_->queue => undef } $self->_plugins; > > return sort keys %queues; > > } > > > > which seems to be DTRT. is this a sensible change or am i misunderstanding > > something? > > Well apart from the mass ugliness, and the hell it'll play with any > ::Integration code where the queue could be malformed for the mta it > looks like it would run. Is that your question? Ok, yes, this /is/ rather a long time after the fact *g*. Was a bit otherwise occupied at the time. My point, was that the existing code means that you can use queues other than post, sub and unsub, but that other than by directly querying the database you can't find out what, if any, queues other than post/sub/unsub are in use, as the code that returns the list of queue names for a list is currently hard-coded to only return post, sub and unsub. Makes life a bit, err, interesting. -- Jody knew (at) pimb (dot) orgThere's stuff above here
Generated at 13:56 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52