[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/06/02]
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 02:35:08PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
> Certainly the 09defer.t would tickle this.
This gets things passing more tests, though of course adds in a
dependency on 0.96 for the ->remove_from_object_index method.
--- lib/Siesta/DBI.pm (revision 1525)
+++ lib/Siesta/DBI.pm (working copy)
@@ -73,7 +73,13 @@
return 1;
}
+sub delete {
+ my $self = shift;
+ $self->remove_from_object_index;
+ return $self->SUPER::delete( @_ );
+}
+
1;
__DATA__
I still need to reach out to the Class::DBI folks and find out where
that needs to live though, Class::DBI proper or Class::DBI::SQLite.
--
Richard Clamp <richardc@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
There's stuff above here
Generated at 13:56 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52