Re: MIME

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/08/13]

--zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 11:15:06PM +0100, richardc@xxxxxxxxx.xxx said:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:11:24PM -0700, Scott Francis wrote:
> > what, your MUA can't speak S/MIME? :)
>=20
> My MUA can just fine.  My web archiver, being made from different
> software, she has troubles.  Look at the spectacular breakage on a
> website not so far from this one.
>=20
> Of course there's also a rant about forcing gpg onto people, but
> that's for another time.

hey, my usage forces nobody else to. Besides, S/MIME is an RFC and has been
for a while - if MUAs *cough*outlook*cough* don't support it, they're not in
compliance. (this is hardly surprising though ...)
--=20
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
      illum oportet crescere me autem minui

--zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/OrjaWaB7jFU39ScRAqgTAKCbs6O4UB6IgwmPH517A4k6VG+EuACg1DrW
UPcHwDyhl20wxzrHIzORUfw=
=G6Fd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg--

• Richard Clamp 23:15 on 13 Aug 2003
  • Scott Francis 23:16 on 13 Aug 2003
    • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= 02:56 on 14 Aug 2003

Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52