Re: Perl

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/09/16]

From: David Champion
Subject: Re: Perl
Date: 20:58 on 16 Sep 2003
* On 2003.09.16, in <p0600200cbb8d13e8ed38@xxx.x.x.xxxx>,
*	"Chris Nandor" <pudge@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> 
> Right.  Because you don't know Perl.

What if he doesn't? He's still allowed to hate it, and on a list for
software catharsis, no less. Holy Mother Jehosaphat, for the love of the
Pope and all that is Catholic, put it away, please. It's clear to us now
who has the larger wrist splint.


I hate... hmm, just to pull one out my back door: mail software
that doesn't properly maintain references: headers so that I can
*PLONK* within specific threads, without writing my own external
killfiler. Really, what would it take to just copy References: and add a
Message-ID? In-Reply-To: is cute, but pretty bloody useless for tracking
a thread of which parts might me missing, such as would appear in, say,
my inbox.

-- 
 -D.    dgc@xxxxxxxx.xxx
 University of Chicago > NSIT > VDN > ENSS > ENSA > You are here
 .  .  .  .  .  .  .
 always line up dots
There's stuff above here

Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52