[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/01/27]
On (01/27 13:35), Matt McLeod wrote: > Calendaring here is done with Corporate Time. We have no Exchange > server, and plan to keep it that way. So I'm not sure what these > people are getting by using Outlook. I can only assume that they've > used Outlook elsewhere and thus insist on continuing to use it, > even if all it can do is be an MUA. from what i've seen, that is in fact the reason. they've used outlook and like the blind little sheep they are, they think that nothing can POSSIBLY be better than OUTLOOK... > (CT is a whole 'nother hate-fest. I shall rant at length once I'm > done with this damned Tru64 DRP bolllocks -- I am our CT-weenie.) man, CT is a fucking noble prize worthy achievement compared to the HORRORS of netscape calendar. (i work for ... well a place that has a LOT vested in netscape :) i acutally use corporate time as an interface to it when i have to use it at all... which brings up another question. is there groupware out there that doesnt make the baby jesus cry? -- Matt Cashner http://eekeek.org eek at eekeek dot org
Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52