Re: Outlook 2003

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/07/30]

From: Foofy
Subject: Re: Outlook 2003
Date: 18:46 on 30 Jul 2004
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:00:18 +1000, Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>  
wrote:

> You get to chose: all or nothing blocking of executable content, which
> includes Word documents. So, I have to advise my clients to turn off the
> "protection", or they can't work.
>
> Hate, hate, hate.  Oh, and hate for the stupid "your fault" protection
> feature as well. :/

The funny thing is before Microsoft did this everyone was b'ching about  
the fact that it let you open executable attachments without so much as a  
warning. Though at the time I don't remember any other email clients that  
did that either! :P

While I think a warning is definitely important thanks to idiot users and  
idiot operating system flaws like extensions (nobody has started a hates  
topic on those yet?) the whole "block it all" approach is downright stupid.

That said, I always enable it on friend and family's computers. I'd rather  
they can't open any attachments than having to go fix their damn computers  
every couple of days.

-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
There's stuff above here

Generated at 09:00 on 03 Aug 2004 by mariachi 0.52