[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/11/09]
Zack Weinberg wrote: > Michael G Schwern <schwern@xxxxx.xxx> writes: > > >>On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:57:32PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> >>>Fuckers at Princeton University can't be bothered to read mail sent to >>>postmaster@. >> >>You obviously don't get enough spam, viruses and backscatter to understand. > > > I wouldn't object to normal junk filters; in fact I imagine there'd be > no getting by without them. I have enough trouble finding false > positives amid the heap of spam I get. > > The filters bloody well better be able to tell the difference between > a piece of spam, and an abuse report quoting a piece of spam, though. I get both kinds of messages, dozens per day. AND I AM NOT A POSTMASTER OF ANYTHING. > zw -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@xxx.xx> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack CohenThere's stuff above here
Generated at 22:00 on 10 Nov 2004 by mariachi 0.52