Re: Fuckers who don't read mail sent to postmaster

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/11/09]

From: Jarkko Hietaniemi
Subject: Re: Fuckers who don't read mail sent to postmaster
Date: 16:52 on 09 Nov 2004
Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Michael G Schwern <schwern@xxxxx.xxx> writes:
> 
> 
>>On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:57:32PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>>Fuckers at Princeton University can't be bothered to read mail sent to
>>>postmaster@.
>>
>>You obviously don't get enough spam, viruses and backscatter to understand.
> 
> 
> I wouldn't object to normal junk filters; in fact I imagine there'd be
> no getting by without them.  I have enough trouble finding false
> positives amid the heap of spam I get.
> 
> The filters bloody well better be able to tell the difference between
> a piece of spam, and an abuse report quoting a piece of spam, though.

I get both kinds of messages, dozens per day.  AND I AM NOT A POSTMASTER
OF ANYTHING.

> zw

-- 
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@xxx.xx> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'.  It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
There's stuff above here

Generated at 22:00 on 10 Nov 2004 by mariachi 0.52