[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/10]
> > Not unless "include" is defined as part of the language, because I may be > > referring to "myobject.include" which has nothing to do with including source > > code. > Yes, include() would have to be part of the standard. The whole point. That means you have to define the hosted environment in FAR more detail than is appropriate for an embedded language, AND in more detail than is justified at this point. There's no guarantee that a Javascript implementation even has a file system available to it through ANY path. The include you're talking about, that belongs in the hosting environment, not the language. I'll agree that the hosting environment sucks, but I've already made that point, but it's NOT something that belongs in the language.There's stuff above here
Generated at 12:00 on 12 Apr 2005 by mariachi 0.52