Re: Outlook hatred.

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/05/01]

From: David Champion
Subject: Re: Outlook hatred.
Date: 23:00 on 01 May 2005
* On 2005.05.01, in <427547E5.9080607@xxxxxxxx.xx>,
*	"Paul Holden" <pholden@xxxxxxxx.xx> wrote:
> 
> On 2005-04-29 11:43, Chris Devers wrote:
> > You don't *have* to use Outlook, do you? Some [evil] companies mandate 
> > it, but you certainly can choose to use something else at home. 
> 
> One of the major clients of the company my buddy works for, demanded
> that they switch to Outlook, because they wanted their suppliers to be
> using a 'standard email client.' Standard? I thought that's what the RFC
>  is for? Oh wait, nobody follows *that.*

Some cow orkers upstairs of me are required by their manager -- who,
thank bog, is not my manager -- to use *Remedy* as an e-mail client.
Because trouble-ticket clients and e-mail are so tightly bound.  I
guess.

If that dictum comes to me (and I lose the ensuing argument), I'm out
the door.

But that's manager hate.  I could get into some Remedy hate, but it
would be six years old and not very fresh.  Anyone else?

-- 
 -D.    dgc@xxxxxxxx.xxx        NSIT    University of Chicago
There's stuff above here

Generated at 09:00 on 03 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52