mailman's rejection policies

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/05/04]

From: Simon Wistow
Subject: mailman's rejection policies
Date: 09:46 on 04 May 2005
I have an announce list, right. And I only ever want a few authorized 
people to be allowed to post to it. So why do I need to rummage through 
the grease trap of held posts deleting all of them in turn. I *know* I 
don't want them. Why can't I just tell you to reject them outright. WHY?

Oh, and for that matter - why no "delete all"

Oh, and whilst in full flow - you put the headers and body of every 
message in a form element. And all form elements are in the same form. 
And the message queue, if we've had a particulalry viscious spam attack, 
can be over a hundred messages long. Spam and viruses can have rather 
large message bodies.

IT'S NOT A PARTICULARLY HARD STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION TO SEE THAT 
SUBMITTING THE FULL TEXT OF A HUNDRED VIRUSES AND HTML SPAMS VIA POST IS 
GOING TO PUT QUITE A LOAD ON THE SERVER. 



GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH.



Somebody should write a mailing list manager in Perl.


Generated at 22:00 on 04 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52