[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/09/17]
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:33:11PM -0500, David Champion wrote: > * On 2005.09.16, in <200509170213.j8H2D5O31304@xxx.xxxxx.xxx>, > * "hv@xxxxx.xxx" <hv@xxxxx.xxx> wrote: > > > > I hear subversion works really well. :) > > I hear it's holy hell. But it's software, so I expect no more. And > it's version-management software, so I super-duper expect no more. It splats lots of pesky little .svn directories throughout my checkout, which confuses my tools no end, so that's hateful because I have to work round it. And as far as I know it doesn't work on VMS. (Which is more hateful than perforce) Then again, I suspect software on VMS is sufficiently hateful that would need a whole list just for it. Maybe HATE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, and then see how all the MUA software out there copes with the distinction... Nicholas ClarkThere's stuff above here
Generated at 11:00 on 20 Sep 2005 by mariachi 0.52