[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/10/13]
--hoZxPH4CaxYzWscb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:22:26PM -0500, Luke Kanies wrote: >=20 > I sweat, I've found someone able to describe what they _liked_ about pyth= on > without comparing it to perl. It makes python-ruby script wars difficult: >=20 > me: ruby is awesome > them: perl sucks! > me: Bartender! Check, please! One thing that bothers me about Python is that one of things they claim as a good thing about their language is that "it isn't Perl". And I have the same problem with both PHP and Ruby. Whenever I read a piece that's supposed to promote Python, PHP or Ruby, somewhere in the beginning they must remark how much better they are than Perl. They're just like Go players. They can't explain what's so great about their game either. But it's better than chess! Abigail --hoZxPH4CaxYzWscb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDTscABOh7Ggo6rasRAggUAJ9vRUAJCUjsTfUidZOYtQeHFd5PvQCghQPu +Q6vR5SsfeCLE5S4SaNrXGk= =3Gxz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hoZxPH4CaxYzWscb--There's stuff above here
Generated at 20:00 on 17 Oct 2005 by mariachi 0.52