Re: Significant whitespace (was Re: Blogging sucks)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/10/17]

From: Matthew Garrett
Subject: Re: Significant whitespace (was Re: Blogging sucks)
Date: 18:12 on 17 Oct 2005
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 06:04:41PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:56:40PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > And have to rewrite huge quantities of software. UTF-8 has its 
> > disadvantages, but there's very little hateful about it - it achieves 
> > what it sets out to do perfectly, and does so without many tools having 
> > to be rewritten.
> 
> Well, apart from all those tools that have to process utf-8 text, of
> course.  Like M*As, string manipulation libraries, terminals, ...

MTAs shouldn't be interpreting any utf-8. MUAs should only care about 
getting the content-type header correct, and optionally converting to 
the "simplest" character set. Terminals and string manipulation 
libraries need rewriting, yes. The number of them that exist is quite 
small compared to the number of applications that store strings.

UCS-4 breaks little assumptions like "A byte with a null in is the end 
of a string". That's fairly hateful.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxx.xxxx.xxx
There's stuff above here

Generated at 20:00 on 17 Oct 2005 by mariachi 0.52