Re: monospace (unless ugly)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/10/27]

From: Peter da Silva
Subject: Re: monospace (unless ugly)
Date: 12:44 on 27 Oct 2005
My Mac Hate right now is the fact that you CAN'T get Mail.app to let 
you edit a response a plain text, no matter how hard you try... it 
still replaces leading "> > > " with stupid colored bars and forces you 
to have to edit around them very very carefully to do a normal inline 
reply. However...

> \{fi}rst, to Jeremy, I apologize: while /normally/ Macs have kerned f
> and i together (as Wikipedia said), in this case it is actually
> replacing the "fi" with a ligature.

Well, yeh, it would have to be. I can't see how there can be any 
kerning in a fixed font.

> Observe the hate: http://rjbs.manxome.org/hates/safari

Courier is hateful in so many ways. The abominable stroke fonts that 
were the first digital versions of Courier took an ugly but at least 
well-formed font and not only made it uglier but they destroyed all the 
fine detail of the font. Then there was the proliferation of versions 
of Courier with different weights and aspect ratios and often missing 
important visual cues. Then they got "enhanced" in all kinds of strange 
ways... like, adding ligatures? Jesus!

I don't know if there's a version of Courier that's anything like the 
Courier you got on an IBM typeball, but there's sure a lot of really 
screwed up fonts called Courier, and they're all ugly as sin. Give me 
Letter Gothic or even Prestige any day.

On my Mac I have "Courier" and "Courier New". I use Monaco and Lucida 
Sans Typewriter.
So...

Which Courier are you using, and why are you using Courier at all?

There's stuff above here

Generated at 23:00 on 30 Oct 2005 by mariachi 0.52