[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/05/24]
On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:01:55 -0500, Peter da Silva <peter@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote: > On May 23, 2006, at 2:30 PM, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > How much skin do you need? Or better how bare can you strip it? > > Who cares? The BIG problem with skinnable apps is that they never ever > *behave* consistently with the native UI (or, in the case of X11, with > any of the native UIs). Even if you replicate the native UI perfectly > in the most efficient skin in teh world, it's still a separate > implementation and will differ in maddeningly subtle and nauseatingly > unsubtle ways. > > I want a GUI where the server does such a fast and efficient and > user-friendly job of rendering user-configurable widgets directly, and > only passes complete operations back to the application, so that people > who write skinnable apps for it are lynched. The horrible thing is, the > closest thing we have to that is a web-browser, and people actually > LIKE web pages that micromanage the UI in horrid and incompatible ways. I fully agree with the above! OTOH I think we live in the loosers camp, as the venodrs of these `bigger' apps, are influenced by the `nmeds' of those imbeciles theat cannot use a pc or application that is not skinnable. Not that I *want* to, but we have to live with that. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.9.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11, & 11.23, SuSE 10.0, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, and Cygwin. http://qa.perl.org http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/There's stuff above here
Generated at 09:00 on 29 May 2006 by mariachi 0.52