[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/07/12]
Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2006-07-12 at 11:00 +0200, Hakim Cassimally wrote: [...] >> I could never quite work out where these names were registered >> (they're not in PATH, but are the short names which respond to "start >> progname" in command line, I rifled through the registry a couple of >> times to try to work it out, unsuccessfully). > > I found it, when I got fed up with not being able to run PuTTY that way; > I've since added a few others. The main limitation is that you're > limited to .exe, from what I recall, so no .bat. The other is that [...] Odd. You are talking about W-r / Start | Run... thingie ? Give the .cmd extension a whirl in lieu of .bat, that may work. Either works for me so perhaps your PC's ext associations are fupped uck. David -- Much of the propaganda that passes for news in our own society is given to immobilising and pacifying people and diverting them from the idea that they can confront power. -- John PilgerThere's stuff above here
Generated at 23:01 on 05 Dec 2006 by mariachi 0.52