[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/10/29]
On 2006-10-29 at 08:53 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > While using styli and clay pads might still be neat, let's get on > with the program and prefer machines/applications that do support > Unicode. (And Unicode 5.0 includes cuneiform, if you are feeling > nostalgic.) Wrong species. Trolls gnaw marks in bones. For writing capability, Ogham would work better. It's in Unicode too and support is in many widespread fonts. For historical accuracy, runic alphabets, even if they are more tricky to incise with teeth. The U16A0-U16FF range covers that. -PhilThere's stuff above here
Generated at 20:01 on 07 Nov 2006 by mariachi 0.52