Re: Veritas NetBackup.

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/11/27]

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Aperghis-Tramoni?=
Subject: Re: Veritas NetBackup.
Date: 23:38 on 27 Nov 2006
David Mackintosh wrote:

> So as a consultant who gets to go different places to do different
> things, I have managed to get exposed to both Veritas NetBackup and
> Bakbone NetVault.
>
> See, in order to change the media in the robot for NetBackup, one
> must go to the robot, remove the media to be removed, and then add
> the media to be added.
>
> Oh wait no, there's another step: you must MANUALLY TELL THE SOFTWARE
> THAT THE CONTENTS OF THE ROBOT HAVE CHANGED.
>
> Oh wait no, there's another step: you must MANUALLY TELL THE SOFTWARE
> THAT THE CHANGES ARE TO BE REFLECTED IN THE SOFTWARE'S IDEA OF WHAT
> IS IN THE ROBOT.

Wow, NetBackup is still that stoopid? I had to use it a few years ago =20=

and I was wondering if I was the stupid one to not being able to just =20=

change a fscking tape and seeing it in the interface. I was also =20
using Arkeia at the same time, and even if it has its own hates, it =20
was at least able to autodetect the tapes.

Oh, and NetBackup Unix GUI was a total mess, the precise as if the =20
guy who made it had decided to follow the opposite of each rule of =20
GUI design. Oh and the installer, written in shell, was also stupid.

--=20
S=E9bastien Aperghis-Tramoni

Close the world, txEn eht nepO.

Generated at 16:01 on 28 Nov 2006 by mariachi 0.52