[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/12/10]
On 10 Dec 2006, at 09:49, Martin Ebourne wrote: > (The linux crowd would have been much better off keeping bash for > scripts and using zsh for interactive, yet another case of NIH > syndrome.) Funny, I always thought zsh itself had the world's worst case of NIH syndrome. The first quirk I ran into when trying out zsh is the one that most shell scripters run into: interpolation of variables whose values contain whitespace doesn't work the way you expect. About which the zsh FAQ says: The classic difference is word splitting, discussed in question 3.1; this catches out very many beginning zsh users. As explained there, this is actually a bug in every other shell. Now that's software with a truly hyperinflated sense of its own importance! -aThere's stuff above here
Generated at 22:02 on 27 Dec 2006 by mariachi 0.52