[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/12/26]
* Yoz Grahame <yoz@xxx.xxx> [2006-12-26 10:10]: > To me, the final nail in TMTOWTDI's coffin was Ruby on Rails vs > Catalyst. In providing loads of different possible arrangements > of template engine and all that other stuff, it both multiplied > the amount of decision making you need to do to get something > basic done, increased unnecessary complexity and as a result > managed to significantly reduce the chance of getting help on > whatever specific problems you hit during your project. Errm, right. That's why noone on the mailing lists uses anything but TT2 and DBIC, why the beginner's tutorials don't mention any other options, and why inquiries about these two tend to get answered very quickly. Of course, it's better to switch to a system where the "ORM" is built by people who say multi-column primary keys are bad for you and foreign keys are pointless. That's "opinionated". Like that certain "RDBMS" whose developers were also "opinionated", I guess, and used to very publically state that transactions are silly (and who needs subselects anyway?). Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>;There's stuff above here
Generated at 14:01 on 28 Dec 2006 by mariachi 0.52