[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2007/01/24]
On 1/24/07, Hakim Cassimally <hakim.cassimally@xxxxx.xxx> wrote: > On 24/01/07, Andrew Black - lists <andrew-lists@xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xx> wrote: > > DO I get the feeling that virtual dimensions is worth avoiding. > > As per muttley's conundrum, I'm not sure whether to hate Virtual > Dimensions or XP. Allegedly XP now supports virtual desktops. Yay! > we all cry. Windows could now have something that Linux has usably > had for years, without having to go through the hackery that made the > various widgets that emulated it (buggily) on WinNT. > > I tried EvilDesk (nice, but ultimately annoying) and a couple of other > alternative windows managers which all sucked in various ways. > Finally I installed Virtual Dimensions, on the basis that it more or > less leaves the default Windows desktop the same, and therefore should > break less. You've tried the virtual desktops Powertoy, yes? http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx -- Yoz
Generated at 04:02 on 27 Jan 2007 by mariachi 0.52