[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2002/10/10]
Hola! I was looking to fix things so that addresses that are <user@xxxx.xxx> get turned into user@xxxx.xxx before being passed to Email::Valid but then I had a think about things and realised this wasn't a good idea. Siesta::Message just uses whatever Email::Valid->address() returns without checking to see if it is undef, ie the email address wasn't valid. The thing is there isn't really much we can do about an invalid address, we might as well just use it and hope for the best. Does this sound sensible? Gavin.
Generated at 13:56 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52