Re: [siesta-dev] tiny refactor thoughts

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/04/01]

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:59:23PM +0100, Richard Clamp said:
> Now I'm starting to think I'm just talking to myself here, but here's
> another little one.

Au contraire.

I've been thinking about arbitary stashes. Sometimes a key=value schema 
isn't enough for a plugin (for example the subscribe plugin could do 
with having a timestamp associated to expire subscription attempts) so 
I was wondering how to achieve something more substantial. Pixie would 
be good ... if it didn't require 5.8. Data::Denter? YAML (I've also 
thought of a YAML Storage backend).

Do we really need it? Is it going to be confusing?

Simon
[cursing insomnia]

• (no message)
  • Re: [siesta-dev] tiny refactor thoughts Simon Wistow 03:00 on 01 Apr 2003
    • Storage and Deferring (was Re: [siesta-dev] tiny refactor thoughts) Richard Clamp 12:14 on 01 Apr 2003
  • Re: [siesta-dev] tiny refactor thoughts Simon Wistow 06:59 on 01 Apr 2003
    • Simon Wistow 07:18 on 01 Apr 2003
      • too deep to show
    • Richard Clamp 09:12 on 01 Apr 2003
      • too deep to show

Generated at 13:56 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52